⌨️Cursor 必备 MCP 组合推荐

Kubernetes penetration testing systematically evaluates cluster security by simulating attacker techniques against the API server, kubelet, etcd, pods, RBAC, network policies, and secrets. Using tools

Kubernetes NetworkPolicies provide pod-level network segmentation by defining ingress and egress rules that control traffic flow between pods, namespaces, and external endpoints. Combined with CNI plu

Docker Bench for Security is an open-source script that checks dozens of common best practices around deploying Docker containers in production. Based on the CIS Docker Benchmark, it audits host confi

Deploying Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access for SASE-based zero trust network access using GlobalProtect agents, ZTNA Connectors, security policy enforcement, and integration with Strata Cloud Manager for unified security management.

Deploys and configures osquery for real-time endpoint monitoring using SQL-based queries to inspect running processes, open ports, installed software, and system configuration. Use when building visibility into endpoint state, threat hunting across fleet, or implementing compliance monitoring. Activates for requests involving osquery deployment, endpoint visibility, fleet management, or SQL-based endpoint querying.

Deploys and configures CrowdStrike Falcon EDR agents across enterprise endpoints to enable real-time threat detection, behavioral analysis, and automated response. Use when onboarding endpoints to EDR coverage, configuring detection policies, or integrating Falcon telemetry with SIEM platforms. Activates for requests involving CrowdStrike deployment, Falcon sensor installation, EDR policy configuration, or endpoint detection and response.

Deploying Cloudflare Access with Cloudflare Tunnel to provide zero trust access to self-hosted and private applications, configuring identity-aware access policies, device posture checks, and WARP client enrollment for VPN replacement.

Deploys deception-based honeytokens in Active Directory including fake privileged accounts with AdminCount=1, fake SPNs for Kerberoasting detection (honeyroasting), decoy GPOs with cpassword traps, and fake BloodHound paths. Monitors Windows Security Event IDs 4769, 4625, 4662, 5136 for honeytoken interaction. Use when implementing AD deception defenses for detecting lateral movement, credential theft, and reconnaissance.

Deploys deception technology including honeypots, honeytokens, and decoy systems to detect attackers who have bypassed perimeter defenses, providing high-fidelity alerts with near-zero false positive rates. Use when SOC teams need early warning of lateral movement, credential abuse, or internal reconnaissance by deploying convincing traps across the network.

Deploy and configure Tailscale as a WireGuard-based zero trust mesh VPN with identity-aware access controls, ACLs, and exit nodes for secure peer-to-peer connectivity.

Deploy a Software-Defined Perimeter using the CSA v2.0 specification with Single Packet Authorization, mutual TLS, and SDP controller/gateway configuration to enforce zero trust network access.

Identifying flaws in application business logic that allow price manipulation, workflow bypass, and privilege escalation beyond what technical vulnerability scanners can detect.

Identifying and exploiting Cross-Origin Resource Sharing misconfigurations that allow unauthorized cross-domain data access and credential theft during security assessments.

Systematically testing web applications for broken access control vulnerabilities including privilege escalation, missing function-level checks, and insecure direct object references.

Testing web applications for path traversal vulnerabilities that allow reading or writing arbitrary files on the server by manipulating file path parameters.

Tests Android inter-process communication (IPC) through intents for vulnerabilities including intent injection, unauthorized component access, broadcast sniffing, pending intent hijacking, and content provider data leakage. Use when assessing Android app attack surface through exported components, testing intent-based data flows, or evaluating IPC security. Activates for requests involving Android intent security, IPC testing, exported component analysis, or Drozer assessment.

Tests API authentication mechanisms for weaknesses including broken token validation, missing authentication on endpoints, weak password policies, credential stuffing susceptibility, token leakage in URLs or logs, and session management flaws. The tester evaluates JWT implementation, API key handling, OAuth flows, and session token entropy to identify authentication bypasses. Maps to OWASP API2:2023 Broken Authentication. Activates for requests involving API authentication testing, token validation assessment, credential security testing, or API auth bypass.

Tests REST and GraphQL APIs for Broken Object Level Authorization (BOLA/IDOR) vulnerabilities where an authenticated user can access or modify resources belonging to other users by manipulating object identifiers in API requests. The tester intercepts API calls, identifies object ID parameters (numeric IDs, UUIDs, slugs), and systematically replaces them with IDs belonging to other users to determine if the server enforces per-object authorization. This is OWASP API Security Top 10 2023 risk API1. Activates for requests involving BOLA testing, IDOR in APIs, object-level authorization testing, or API access control bypass.

Tests APIs for mass assignment (auto-binding) vulnerabilities where clients can modify object properties they should not have access to by including additional parameters in API requests. The tester identifies writable endpoints, adds undocumented fields to request bodies (role, isAdmin, price, balance), and checks if the server binds these to the data model without filtering. Part of OWASP API3:2023 Broken Object Property Level Authorization. Activates for requests involving mass assignment testing, parameter binding abuse, auto-binding vulnerability, or API over-posting.

Systematically assessing REST and GraphQL API endpoints against the OWASP API Security Top 10 risks using automated and manual testing techniques.

Tests WebSocket API implementations for security vulnerabilities including missing authentication on WebSocket upgrade, Cross-Site WebSocket Hijacking (CSWSH), injection attacks through WebSocket messages, insufficient input validation, denial-of-service via message flooding, and information leakage through WebSocket frames. The tester intercepts WebSocket handshakes and messages using Burp Suite, crafts malicious payloads, and tests for authorization bypass on WebSocket channels. Activates for requests involving WebSocket security testing, WS penetration testing, CSWSH attack, or real-time API security assessment.

Tests OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect implementations for security flaws including authorization code interception, redirect URI manipulation, CSRF in OAuth flows, token leakage, scope escalation, and PKCE bypass. The tester evaluates the authorization server, client application, and token handling for common misconfigurations that enable account takeover or unauthorized access. Activates for requests involving OAuth security testing, OIDC vulnerability assessment, OAuth2 redirect bypass, or authorization code flow testing.

Tests authentication and authorization mechanisms in mobile application APIs to identify broken authentication, insecure token management, session fixation, privilege escalation, and IDOR vulnerabilities. Use when performing API security assessments against mobile app backends, testing JWT implementations, evaluating OAuth flows, or assessing session management. Activates for requests involving mobile API auth testing, token security assessment, OAuth mobile flow testing, or API authorization bypass.

Assessing JSON Web Token implementations for cryptographic weaknesses, algorithm confusion attacks, and authorization bypass vulnerabilities during security engagements.

Discovering and exploiting XML External Entity injection vulnerabilities to read server files, perform SSRF, and exfiltrate data during authorized penetration tests.

Identifying and validating cross-site scripting vulnerabilities using Burp Suite's scanner, intruder, and repeater tools during authorized security assessments.

Tests web applications for Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities by injecting JavaScript payloads into reflected, stored, and DOM-based contexts to demonstrate client-side code execution, session hijacking, and user impersonation. The tester identifies all injection points and output contexts, crafts context-appropriate payloads, and bypasses sanitization and CSP protections. Activates for requests involving XSS testing, cross-site scripting assessment, client-side injection testing, or JavaScript injection vulnerability testing.

Test web applications for XML injection vulnerabilities including XXE, XPath injection, and XML entity attacks to identify data exposure and server-side request forgery risks.

Identifying sensitive data exposure vulnerabilities including API key leakage, PII in responses, insecure storage, and unprotected data transmission during security assessments.

Identify and test open redirect vulnerabilities in web applications by analyzing URL redirection parameters, bypass techniques, and exploitation chains for phishing and token theft.

Test JWT implementations for critical vulnerabilities including algorithm confusion, none algorithm bypass, kid parameter injection, and weak secret exploitation to achieve authentication bypass and privilege escalation.

Test web applications for HTTP Host header injection vulnerabilities to identify password reset poisoning, web cache poisoning, SSRF, and virtual host routing manipulation risks.

Test web application email functionality for SMTP header injection vulnerabilities that allow attackers to inject additional email headers, modify recipients, and abuse contact forms for spam relay.

Diagnose and recover Cursor backend failures for Harness workflows. Use when user invokes cursor:rescue, Cursor delegation fails, cursor-agent is missing, setup-cursor fails, or backend resolution unexpectedly falls back to claude.

Delegate a single write task to Cursor Composer via cursor-companion.sh inside an isolated worktree, then Lead-review the diff and cherry-pick. Use when user invokes cursor:do, says delegate to cursor, have composer write it, refactor with cursor, hand a file edit to Composer. Do NOT load for: planning, code review only, read-only investigation, or multi-task team runs (use breezing --cursor or cursor:ask instead).

Read-only delegate to cursor-agent (Composer) for questions, investigation, design discussion, and adversarial sanity checks. No worktree, no cherry-pick, no Lead diff review — cursor-agent is locked to ask mode and cannot write. Use when user says: ask cursor, cursor sanity check, get a second opinion, adversarial review, design discussion, investigate with cursor, cursor:ask. Do NOT load for: implementation, refactor, file edits, commit/push work, anything requiring write access (use cursor:do or breezing --cursor instead).

Run a Cursor Composer review as an advisory second opinion while keeping the primary review verdict on the host brain. Use when user invokes cursor:review, asks Cursor to review, or wants composer to sanity-check a diff. Cursor never owns APPROVE/REQUEST_CHANGES.

Configure and verify the Cursor backend for Claude Code Harness. Use when user invokes cursor:setup, wants Cursor as the local default implementation backend, or asks to check Cursor plugin/agent readiness. Distribution default remains opt-in; only local env/user settings are changed when explicitly requested.

Diagnose and recover Cursor backend failures for Harness workflows. Use when user invokes cursor:rescue, Cursor delegation fails, cursor-agent is missing, setup-cursor fails, or backend resolution unexpectedly falls back to claude.

Delegate a single write task to Cursor Composer via cursor-companion.sh inside an isolated worktree, then Lead-review the diff and cherry-pick. Use when user invokes cursor:do, says delegate to cursor, have composer write it, refactor with cursor, hand a file edit to Composer. Do NOT load for: planning, code review only, read-only investigation, or multi-task team runs (use breezing --cursor or cursor:ask instead).

Read-only delegate to cursor-agent (Composer) for questions, investigation, design discussion, and adversarial sanity checks. No worktree, no cherry-pick, no Lead diff review — cursor-agent is locked to ask mode and cannot write. Use when user says: ask cursor, cursor sanity check, get a second opinion, adversarial review, design discussion, investigate with cursor, cursor:ask. Do NOT load for: implementation, refactor, file edits, commit/push work, anything requiring write access (use cursor:do or breezing --cursor instead).

Configure and verify the Cursor backend for Claude Code Harness. Use when user invokes cursor:setup, wants Cursor as the local default implementation backend, or asks to check Cursor plugin/agent readiness. Distribution default remains opt-in; only local env/user settings are changed when explicitly requested.

Run a Cursor Composer review as an advisory second opinion while keeping the primary review verdict on the host brain. Use when user invokes cursor:review, asks Cursor to review, or wants composer to sanity-check a diff. Cursor never owns APPROVE/REQUEST_CHANGES.

Manage MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers for openclacky: add, list, probe, remove, reconfigure. Edits ~/.clacky/mcp.json so the user never writes JSON by hand. Trigger on: add mcp, install mcp, setup mcp, configure mcp, mcp list, mcp remove, mcp probe, mcp reconfigure.

Use when creating new skills, editing existing skills, or verifying skills work before deployment.

Use when you have a spec or requirements for a multi-step task, before touching code. Creates bite-sized TDD implementation plans with dependency tracking.