Agent Skill 目录与安装教程 — ClawHub、SkillsMP 与开源 Skill

io.github.dotnet/maui/code-review

Deep code review of PR changes for correctness, safety, and MAUI conventions. Uses independence-first assessment (code before narrative) and delegates to the maui-expert-reviewer agent for per-dimension sub-agent evaluation. Triggers on: "review code for PR", "code review PR", "analyze code changes", "check PR code quality". Do NOT use for: summarizing PRs, describing what changed, general PR questions, running tests, or fixing code.

io.github.flutter/agent-plugins/api-review

Reviews the specified code against the canonical API Design guidelines. Use this skill when the user asks for an API review or to check code against API design principles.

io.github.EveryInc/compound-engineering-plugin/ce-doc-review

Review requirements, plans, or specs with role-specific lenses. Use when the user wants to improve an existing planning document.

io.github.asgeirtj/system_prompts_leaks/code-review

Review the current diff for correctness bugs and reuse/simplification/efficiency cleanups at the given effort level (low/medium: fewer, high-confidence findings; high→max: broader coverage, may include uncertain findings; ultra: deep multi-agent review in the cloud). Pass --comment to post findings as inline PR comments, or --fix to apply the findings to the working tree after the review.

io.github.dotnet/maui/review-test-failures

Classifies PR CI/test failures as likely PR-caused or unrelated, compares against base-branch baseline, and emits an overall merge-readiness verdict. Uses gathered GitHub/AzDO/Helix context and the shared MAUI CI facts.

io.github.open-metadata/OpenMetadata/code-review

Use to review code changes with a two-stage process - first checking spec/requirements compliance, then code quality. Works on staged changes, branches, or PRs.

io.github.dotnet/runtime/code-review

Review code changes in dotnet/runtime for correctness, performance, and consistency with project conventions. Use when reviewing PRs or code changes.

io.github.openai/codex/review-agent

Perform a read-only, defect-first review of a specified code change and return every actionable finding. Use when another agent delegates review of uncommitted changes, a base-branch diff, a commit, or custom review instructions.

io.github.BuilderIO/agent-native/design-review-feedback

Work through persisted, element-anchored review comments on shared Design prototypes and close the loop with verified edits.

io.github.NVIDIA/NemoClaw/nemoclaw-maintainer-security-code-review

Reviews code changes in a GitHub PR or issue for security. Checks changed files against nine categories and reports PASS/WARNING/FAIL verdicts. Use when reviewing pull requests for security vulnerabilities, hardcoded secrets, injection flaws, auth bypasses, or insecure configurations. Trigger keywords - security review, code review, appsec, vulnerability assessment, security audit, review PR security.

io.github.PostHog/posthog/review-hog-validation-criteria

The validation criteria for ReviewHog — the bar for deciding whether a flagged PR issue is worth keeping. Keeps real, user-affecting correctness / security / data-loss / contract / performance problems; drops overengineering, speculation, paranoia, never-gonna-happen edge cases, and style.

io.github.PostHog/posthog/review-hog-perspective-performance-reliability

The Performance & Reliability review perspective for ReviewHog. Verifies that changed code will perform and hold up in production — resource efficiency, error handling and recovery, scalability, and operational readiness. Reports performance and reliability issues only.

io.github.PostHog/posthog/review-hog-perspective-logic-correctness

The Logic & Correctness review perspective for ReviewHog. Verifies that changed code does what it is supposed to do — business logic, edge cases, data transformations, and query / data-access correctness. Reports correctness issues only; security and performance are separate perspectives.

io.github.PostHog/posthog/review-hog-perspective-contracts-security

The Contracts & Security review perspective for ReviewHog. Verifies that changed code is safe and maintains compatibility — API contracts and breaking changes, injection / authz / data exposure, input validation, and schema / interface alignment. Reports security and contract issues only.

io.github.PostHog/posthog/review-hog-blind-spots-general

The general blind-spot check for ReviewHog — the final sweep that runs after every enabled review perspective has reviewed a chunk. Hunts for real, high-value issues that ALL of the perspectives missed, conditioned on what they actually found; returns an empty list over padding.

io.github.PostHog/posthog/review-hog-authoring

How to author custom ReviewHog skills — the review perspectives, blind-spot checks, and validation criteria that drive ReviewHog's automated PR reviews. Use when a user wants a new review perspective (a specialist lens on their PRs), a custom blind-spot sweep, or their own validation bar for which findings get published. Trigger on "create a ReviewHog perspective", "custom review perspective", "my own blind-spot check", "custom validation criteria", "tune what ReviewHog publishes".

io.github.simstudioai/sim/emcn-design-review

Review UI code for alignment with the emcn design system — components, tokens, patterns, and conventions

io.github.gibbok/typescript-book/typescript-book-review

Review and editing guide for TypeScript book and reference content in the style of The Concise TypeScript Book. Use when reviewing or editing educational prose, translated or non-English content, code examples, chapters, table-of-contents entries, or Markdown formatting in this repository to identify and fix typos, grammar mistakes, formatting problems, and minor clarity issues without altering the original meaning or the book’s concise, practical, example-driven style.

io.github.langfuse/langfuse/code-review

Shared code review workflow for Langfuse. Use when reviewing a PR, branch, diff, or local changes for correctness, regressions, risk, and missing tests. Start with references/review-checklist.md for repo-specific review rules and use package AGENTS.md files plus any matching shared skills when the change touches those areas.

io.github.code-yeongyu/oh-my-openagent/review-work

Post-implementation review orchestrator. Launches 5 parallel background sub-agents: Oracle (goal/constraint verification), Oracle (code quality), Oracle (security), unspecified-high (hands-on QA execution), unspecified-high (context mining from GitHub/git/Slack/Notion). All must pass for review to pass. MUST USE before a PR handoff or when the user explicitly asks to review completed work. Triggers: 'review work', 'review my work', 'review changes', 'QA my work', 'verify implementation', 'check my work', 'validate changes', 'post-implementation review'.

io.github.apache/doris/code-review

Review code with Doris-specific checklists

io.github.zeroclaw-labs/zeroclaw/github-pr-review-session

Human-reviewer co-pilot for ZeroClaw PR reviews. Use this skill when the user wants to review a specific PR as themselves, re-review a PR after author changes, work through a queue of PRs, check what's still open on a PR, or post a formal review verdict. Trigger on: 'review 1234', 'can you look at PR #1234', 're-review 1234', 'check 1234', 'what's still open on 1234', 'go through the queue', 'next PR', 'review the open PRs'. This skill posts reviews in the voice of the active `gh` account holder using gh CLI.